Las Vegas Sun

January 28, 2015

Currently: 62° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Where I Stand:

We have a right to feel safe

Another view?

View more of the Las Vegas Sun's opinion section:

Editorials - the Sun's viewpoint.

Columnists - local and syndicated writers.

Letters to the editor - readers' views.

Have your own opinion? Write a letter to the editor.

In the end, they just didn’t feel safe.

Assembly Majority Leader William Horne expressed that sentiment after the very sad saga of Assemblyman Steven Brooks during the process that led to his being expelled by the legislative body to which he was duly elected.

No one should take comfort in exercising that kind of action against a friend, a colleague and a person the voters had determined was best able to represent their interests.

But his expulsion from the Legislature had to happen. It was in the best interests of the Legislature, the people of Nevada and the need to do the people’s business without fear of bodily or other harm.

Of course, a just society should also help Brooks manage whatever is causing him to act in such a harmful and threatening manner. To do less or to ignore him now that he has been expelled is to flirt with disaster. We have had too many firsthand experiences lately with the results of ignoring people with obvious signs of mental illness.

So let’s get beyond Brooks and see whether we can apply Horne’s sentiment to the rest of our daily lives. I suggest we can.


Controversy over the Second Amendment notwithstanding, Americans are entitled to feel as safe as possible as they go about their business. Many people think that owning weapons puts them in better control of their own safety.

I tend to agree with that position, assuming that proper safety precautions are followed, children are not allowed near them and adults always act like adults. A huge assumption, I know.

The question is whether, in our quest to “feel safe,” we are making the right choices regarding gun safety laws. And the answer is: It depends.

It depends on whether the American people are so tired of seeing innocent children slaughtered in our schools, in movie theaters, in shopping centers and on our streets that they will finally come to the belief that “they don’t feel safe” under the current regimen of rules that govern our guns. With each passing day, the public seems to feel that not enough is being done.

And that will translate into public policy that will be uncomfortable for some politicians to deal with, unpleasant for some Second Amendment advocates to accept, and unheard of for a Congress controlled by the National Rifle Association to implement. But, just like the difficult decision that had to be made in the Brooks case, so, too, will Congress have to act with regard to guns. And act soon.

That doesn’t mean that every good idea will get passed into law, but certainly more than a few of them will. And then we will see what happens.

If gun violence decreases, if the slaughter of innocents all but disappears, then we will know that we did something good — something that made Americans feel and be safer. If it doesn’t work, we will have to look at doing more.

But for now, just like the Nevada Legislature did, we must do something.


How safe can we feel about the future for our next generation of leaders if we are shirking our solemn obligation to educate and prepare today’s young people while other countries’ youths are more competent, more knowledgeable and better educated than our own?

We are long past the time for action, and no one should feel safe with the status quo.

In Clark County we have two immediate educational challenges. One is to get the Legislature to devise a funding formula that allows the higher education institutions in the other 16 counties to function but also pays heed to the gross inequity that has been Clark County’s lot. The blame is ours, for failing to use our political muscle and allowing Southern Nevada’s future to be controlled by Northern Nevada interests. We can’t feel safe with the status quo in the funding of higher education.

With the resignation of Clark County Schools Superintendent Dwight Jones, we are no longer feeling safe that our schools will be reformed to better educate our young people. That is not because there isn’t a growing will among parents to support both reform and the dollars needed to enact them; it is more because we know that we no longer have the luxury of time.

Being safe is a concept that Americans have always taken for granted. It is a basic tenet enshrined in the Constitution by words like “promoting common defense” and securing “the blessings of liberty” and “promoting the general welfare.”

We all know that protecting and defending that Constitution often comes at a great price. But in the case of Brooks, or in finding a common sense approach to gun safety, or in fulfilling our responsibility to educate our young people, the price we must pay is far from the ultimate one we ask of our nation’s defenders.

In these particular matters, all we have to do is make the decisions that make us “feel safe.”

That shouldn’t be very much to ask of ourselves.

Brian Greenspun is publisher and editor of the Las Vegas Sun.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Bad behavior has consequences regardless of the reasons. The Assembly was right to oust Mr. Brooks for the good of all including Mr. Brooks. He needs full time mental guidance, treatment and observation. The best way to get that is with medical professionals.

    Carmine D

  2. Long ago, let's say in the 1960s and 1970s, in our country's quest to apply equity standards to empower minorities, the unintended consequences was "throwing the baby out with the bathwater."

    The doors of government institutions, housing both the mentally ill, medically fragile, and the intellectually challenged, were flung open, and those souls were released into the care of "privatized caregivers", whose bottomline was the all mighty dollar, not necessarily these individual's quality of life nor care. We all see how that is and has worked out.

    Furthermore, injury was added to the insult with laws that made it difficult to identify and share critical information so that affected individuals could get the care they needed. Sure, it protected their "privacy", but it also impeded valuable record keeping that could show patterns or behaviors, that are vital for medical providers in evaluation and treatment, and ability to do interventions.

    Now is the time to look at how effective and worthwhile some of the decisions in the past are working out in the present, and fix where it is broken. We all benefit in doing this. Commenter Bradley Chapline suggested a thoughtful plan that would most definitely be a great start.

    There is no doubt that our country can do much better in regards to our behavior and actions towards mental health!

    Blessings and Peace,

  3. Interesting idea. We all have a "right to feel safe." That's a barrel of worms that was best not opened. To feel at all safe, you must openly and obviously carry a firearm at all times. On the other hand, I have no idea who you are, what your intentions are, what your level of expertise is, the degree of your mental stability. As a result I feel most intensely threatened as you follow me into my local grocery/drugstore/bank. Which of us has the superior right to feel safe? Who decides? Who enforces that decision? HOW is it enforced? How can the one with the inferior right be forced to accept the decision?

  4. Perhaps I worded that awkwardly. Brad. The words you quote are NOT my personal opinion. My intent was to illustrate that what one person feels necessary to do to feel safe, may be readily invoke feelings of definite personal threat by another person. When two people's perceptions of one specific action are in direct conflict, how do we decide who has the superior right to "feel safe?" Questions such as this MUST be answered if we ALL have a RIGHT to feel safe vs a reasonable expectation of generally feeling safe when we exercise due diligence.

  5. Like in many things Mr. Greenspun you are just talk. Where were you in compelling help on Brooks. It just wasn't you, EVERYONE just stood by and watched him auger in. All the lawmakers in the Legislature did little to help. Brooks needed to have help compelled. How would you be feeling if he had been killed by CHP?

    You and a lot of people have missed the point in the mass killings of late. We need people with influence to change the laws so those that need help can get it compelled on them. So far it's been a lot easier to blame guns, it's politically safer. The hard road is in getting help for the mentally ill. No one so far has the cajones to do so. So whatever you say on this Mr. Greenspun means very little.

    You have the pulpit to make a difference but like the legislators up north you aren't about to do anything about it.