Las Vegas Sun

April 24, 2014

Currently: 79° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Las Vegas Sol:

Battle for votes begins as Senate prepares to debate immigration bill

House is preparing its own legislation

Image

J. Scott Applewhite / AP

A bipartisan group of leading senators announce that they have reached agreement on the principles of sweeping legislation to rewrite the nation’s immigration laws, during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington, Monday, Jan. 28, 2013. From left are Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., and Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.

The Senate's immigration reform legislation made it out of the Judiciary Committee last week and is scheduled for debate in front of the full Senate the week of June 10.

Between now and then, advocates and opponents will try to sway politicians, and the lawmakers themselves will angle for their undecided colleagues to join their side.

Late last week, Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., told Univision: "We don't currently have 60 votes identified in the Senate."

Sixty votes would be needed to close debate in case of a potential filibuster. Additionally, members of the "Gang of Eight" that drew up the bill have said they are targeting 70 votes, in a show of broad support before the bill is sent to the House of Representatives.

Majority Leader Harry Reid pushed back on Menendez's comments when he told the Sun's Anjeanette Damon it "should be pretty easy" to secure 60 votes for the immigration reform bill.

Meanwhile, after the Heritage Foundation released a much-discussed report on the potential costs of immigration reform, other groups have weighed in on the debate.

The left-leaning Center for American Progress did a state-by-state analysis of the estimated economic impact of passing the immigration reform legislation. In Nevada, the organization estimated there were 190,000 immigrants in the state without legal status. Over 10 years, the legalization of the population would generate $534 million in tax revenue and a $17.9 billion increase in gross state product.

Also, more than 100 economists signed on to a May 23 letter to the Senate and House leadership supporting immigration reform, arguing the net impact would be economic growth. The letter was spearheaded by the right-leaning American Action Forum, and the signatories are identified as "conservative" economists.

While Reid is a strong supporter of the legislation, Sen. Dean Heller recently penned an op-ed for the Las Vegas Review-Journal in which he called for bipartisan work to pass reform and lauded the course set in the Senate while stopping short of fully backing the bill as it stands.

"Our nation needs comprehensive immigration reform, and the immigration reform proposal championed by the 'Gang of Eight' just may be our answer. When it comes to fixing our immigration system, I believe that most Nevadans actually agree on about 80 percent of the policy. It's that other 20 percent where we disagree that tends to become the focus. I've been encouraged to see this particular piece of legislation continue to move through the regular legislative process and hope it continues," Heller wrote.

Some pro-reform advocates have hope Heller will endorse the bill well before any vote on the Senate floor, possibly swaying other Republicans on the fence. The Sun's Karoun Demirjian reported last week that Heller was not biting, for now.

The full Senate is expected to take up the immigration reform in early June after addressing the farm bill, while the House of Representatives has its own "gang" of bipartisan legislators working on a proposal. The House plan is expected to be unveiled next week.

While immigration reform is likely to at least garner a simple majority in the Senate, the GOP-led House is much harder to read. With redistricting reducing the voter diversity in Republican-held House districts, the incentive to vote in favor of reform may not be strong for Republican House members.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Heller....on the fence with both ears to the ground. Nothing new there.

  2. "100 economists signed on to a May 23 letter to the Senate"... well that's so much more important and significant than 20 Million American's currently unemployed in the U.S.A.

  3. Dump EVERY politician that votes for this disaster. Anyone who puts illegals in front of American citizens and taxpayers.... Would add move than $6 Trillion to the national debt PLUS all the costs of K-12, state/local TANF, EBT SNAP, child care match, ER / health care.... If they want to reunite families, GO HOME. They invaded without permission and can remain on the fringe until they GO HOME--or until SCOTUS rules that anchor babies born here when Mama was here illegally are NOT citizens. Check out Nevada Newsmakers when Ty Cobb explained that amnesty was the BIGGEST MISTAKE of the Reagan administration and they regretted it. Since, the numerous mini-amnesties keep encouraging these people to invade rather than make a living at home. 50 million or so invaded and they're still not doing the agricultural work so GIVE IT A REST.

  4. FIRST secure the border INCLUDING enforcing our laws against employers of illegals. How many will stay IF AND WHEN we cut them off welfare, food stamps, free utilities, housing vouchers, free health care, free K-12, reduced higher ed tuition...while American seniors go hungry in the cold.

  5. IF YOU WANT THIS AMNESTY BILL TO PASS, THEN SIT BACK AND RELAX. IF
    NOT, DO SOMETHING TO STOP IT.

    Heller and Reid need to be hearing the public's deep objections to the S. 744 immigration bill that will get a vote of the full Senate on June 10.

    The word from various Senate staffers is that if they are not hearing the phones ring with objections EVERY day, the Senators and their top advisors assume that opposition is dying down. We can't let let the Senators and staffs thinking they can get by with voting FOR this bill.

    IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO CALL HELLER and what do you have to lose by e-mailing Reid? Would taking 5 minutes out of your time complaining on internet kill you? Do it just to irritate Him.

    Call your 2 Senators and tell them to vote NO on S.744 the Amnesty bill. (Here's a toll-free number: 888-978-3094). You can leave a message after hours with most Senators 24 hours a day.

    If you're nervous about making that first call to a Senate receptionists, just say your name and where you are from and ask them to tell the Senator that he/she should vote NO on S.744 because it puts amnesty before enforcement.

    Here's how to find out who your reps are and their e-mail addresses:
    http://www.contactingthecongress.org

    But if you want to say a few more words, use any or all of these talking points, and as they are written or (better) in your own words.

    YOUR BASIC TALKING POINTS

    *Vote NO on S. 744 which moves all promises of immigration enforcement to after it gives work permits to 11 million illegal aliens. It is not enforcement-first but amnesty-first.

    *All the polls this week show that most Americans are opposed to anything that isn't enforcement-first.

    *The Judiciary Committee had many chances to change the bill and every time voted against enforcement-first. KILL THE BILL.